Start-ups hitting scale
Teams that proved their MVP and now need an architecture that holds up when traffic grows ten times over.
Caching, database tuning and bottlenecks
Growing technical teams
Expert software architecture consulting and mentoring for engineering teams
Reading documentation or watching courses is sometimes not enough; an experienced architect helps your team avoid the traps and the technical debt of distributed systems.
- +40architecture reviews
- 99.98%uptime after a review
- +180hours of mentoring
Who it is for
Which teams and people is this for?
To get past the hidden problems of scale before your customers notice them.
Enterprise teams with technical debt
Organisations with legacy services, a heavy monolith or tangled microservices, where shipping a new feature has slowed to a crawl.
Modular refactors, DDD and fault isolation
Senior developers ready to grow
Seniors who want to think like a software architect and understand the advanced patterns of distributed systems in depth.
Ready for a tech-lead or architect role
A transparent process
The toolbox, and how a review session runs
Three steps from a system that is slowing down to one that stays up.
-
01 Find the problem
Profiling and finding the leaks
Wire up an APM, trace concurrent requests and hunt down slow N+1 queries in the database layer.
> Alert: Memory leak at Worker #4 [High GC pause]
-
02 Re-engineer
Reshaping events and caches
Move heavy work onto asynchronous queues (Celery / Kafka) and put a layered Redis cache in front of what is read most.
> Refactor: Async event streaming enabled
-
03 Verify and benchmark
Load testing and settling in production
Run hard load scenarios with Locust / k6 and hand the team clear documentation for keeping it that way.
> Benchmark passed: 0% dropped packets @ 25k RPS
From earlier work
What technical leads and engineers say
What the sessions changed in the stability of systems and the growth of the people on the team.
The architecture reviews were one of the best decisions we made this year. A crash that had hit our payment service at every peak for weeks was fixed at the root within two weeks.
Weekly mentoring changed our junior and mid-level engineers. The code reviews were never only about finding mistakes — they taught a structured way of thinking.
I always got stuck on the system-design round of international interviews. The one-to-one sessions and the million-user exercises changed where my career was heading.
Common questions
Questions that usually come up
Is an NDA signed before we start?
Yes. Your code and your architecture stay private: a mutual non-disclosure agreement is signed before I see any code, diagram or repository.
How are the sessions held — online or in person?
Mostly online over Google Meet, so live code can be shared and the session recorded. In Tehran, the kick-off and the final presentation can be held at your office.
What does the team need before an architecture review?
Access to your logs or monitoring, the repository of the service in question, a rough diagram of the system and one senior engineer at the kick-off. No documentation? We draw it together in the first session.
How do payment and invoicing work?
A formal company contract with an official invoice is possible, as are payments per delivered phase. The terms are agreed in the first assessment session.
The first step
Book a first assessment and a technical conversation
A free 30-minute session to look at your system as it is, set goals for the team and choose the best way to work together.
- 30 minutes, online
- Everything you share stays confidential
- A reply within one working day